Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Blog reviews


These are some of my favorite blog reviews of Racing Daylight (running on SHOWTIME now!) for differing reasons.  Mostly, I'm glad these folks took the time to write.

On one of these, I, yes, took to the comments section and we had a pretty healthy exchange.   Me, wondering why the blogger wouldn't focus on the films he did like, as opposed to the bracingly bad ones.  Ouch!  To each his ...

I hope you enjoy.  I have. After all, we're just racing daylight.


 This one from: post-Punk Cinema Club

 If NPR ever decided to start making movies, Racing Daylight would probably be their first box office smash. (Or flop, actually.) Because Racing Daylight - a tweedy, low-fi look at a small, East Coast town's past and present - is very, very NPR. And it stars David Strathairn! You can't get more charmingly "this American life" than that. Cape Cod ho! Sadie (Melissa Leo) lives a dead-end life on Sesame Street whatever street she lives on in Cedarsville, New York. Death and life are a bit blurred here in Cedarsville, since Sadie's been receiving spectral visitations from Civil War vets. When not seeing ghosts, she tends to her catatonic grandmother (Le Clanche du Rand) and pines mutely after the dashing handyman (and adorably nerdy Civil War freak), Henry (David Strathairn, looking pretty dashing indeed!). The ghosts meanwhile creep in and take over Sadie's life, flinging her back to the high romance of Cedarsville during the Civil War, when she - now named Anna - was pining much more vocally for the dashing soldier, Harry (David Strathairn, now with facial hair and even more dashing!), and her young, slightly dodgy "killer inside me" husband, Edmund (Jason Downs). Filmed on a shoestring budget, with costumes and props seemingly from the Dollar Store, Racing Daylight has some moments which are adorable and quirky and charming, and many other moments which are scrape-out-your-eyeballs awful. Relatedly, the tone swings wildly around - is it a Gothic horror-romance? Is it a whimsical What's Eating Gilbert Grape?-ish look at the weird and wonderful of American's forgotten poor? Is it a David Strathairn/Civil War broad comedy gush fest? Any of these options would have been great. Unfortunately, Racing Daylight has shrieking violins in one moment and dueling banjos the next. It has some very good acting - such as David Strathairn's pitch perfect weirdness as Henry the Nerd, with his "Do you like facts?" non sequiturs - and some very bad acting - such as Melissa Leo going a bit too broad on the coy girlishness of Sadie-infatuated. The writing is rough. And, overall, everyone is very, very earnest - which earns some points, at least. Hey, we wouldn't mind sitting in a classroom or a museum and watching this while someone explained the threading work in Union uniforms. Hey, so we're earnest Civil War buffs too - sue us! But should YOU watch it? ("Wait, wait, don't tell me!" we hear you cry.) Well... if, like us, you get your kicks from American history and, especially, facts, then yes. There just aren't enough Civil War movies out there, and it's always nice to see a smart Union uniform. Be warned, though, this is not by any measure a "good" movie. It's clunky, clumsy, awkwardly filmed and very cheap. If you want fancy, polished filmwork on the era, go for Glory (to cry), Gettysburg (to learn, and then cry), Cold Mountain (OK, we haven't actually seen this one) or Shenandoah (to Jimmy Stewart). If you don't need to focus on the Civil War, but instead would just appreciate a handheld tour through history with David Strathairn, preferably in a state of romantic poverty, then you can watch any number of excellent John Sayles films - Limbo (Alaska!), Matewan (West Virginia!), Eight Men Out (daaaa Bears!). If you don't have any of those at hand, this will do. Oh yeah, and if you like Tom Waits' experimental industrial music with saws and banjos and other hard-to-identify instruments, you can watch this. The intro music is crazy! <=== and what is that cover about?! 



Racing Daylight races heart beat from Bellonline

Guest Author - Lorna London Sloukji



"I always knew I would end up insane," says Sadie Stokes, one of the protagonists in Nicole Quinn's Racing Daylight.

A story that encompasses ghosts, murder, passion, and love, Racing Daylight unfolds three stories, told from three different perspectives.

The first story shown is Sadie's, a lonely woman living in the country who takes care of her sick grandmother. Played by Melissa Leo, Sadie's life becomes saturated with colour and adventure when she sees a man in her mirror that calls the name "Anna". Sadie then begins to act out as her ancestor, Anna exemplifying characteristics of boldness, much more different than her original personality.

We learn that Sadie and Anna both want Henry, played by David Strathairn, the farm's handyman who "Anna" mistakes for Harry, her lover.

We also see the love and mystery story unfold through Henry's perspectives. Played by David Strathairn, Henry's storytelling unravels his relationship with Anna, leading to another man in Anna's life, which then results in yet another perspective. Edmund's story discloses even more information, as viewers learn more about Anna, the two men in her life, and what happened to her to cause such inner turmoil.

Award-winning writer and theatre director, Nicole Quinn makes her feature film directorial debut with Racing Daylight, a story rich with plot and character development.

Reviews for Racing Daylight have commended its narrative structure, performances, and overall presentation.

"Excellent work!" says director, Seret Scott. "Every element (cast, crew, designers, editors, writer-director) everybody was completely on-board in making (this) moving, frightening, visually stunning film."

Writer and director, Nicole Quinn endured many hardships including losing loved ones. She wrote Racing Daylight amidst all the rapid changes in her life, declaring this screenplay as "a map through the then unknown land of grief."

Is this another chick flick? Another love story with complex characters? If you enjoy symbolism, question your haunting past, or wonder about the transcendence of time, then Racing Daylight is simply a great film full of colourful characters, astounding performances, and a solid screenplay.
"If you don’t mind that some things in life are not readily explainable, then this may well be a journey you’d like to take," says Quinn.

Racing Daylight released on DVD December 23, 2008.


DVDebuts: Two Bracingly Bad Ones -- RACING DAYLIGHT, GENE GENERATION



Sometimes there's nothing like areally bad movie to make you appreciate the good ones. Even mediocre fare can look surprisingly competent, once you've subjected yourself to films as poorly conceived and executed asRACING DAYLIGHT) or so thoroughly second-, third- and fourth-hand like THE GENE GENERATION.

I rented Racing Daylight on the basis of its cast, which includesMelissa Leo, below (nominated for an Oscar this year for her work in Frozen River), and

David Strathairn (above). I've loved Ms Leo's work since I first encountered it in an off-Broadway theatre more than 20 years ago, and I have never seen her give a bad performance. Until now. I can only credit the film's writer/director Nicole Quinn for what must have been her help in obtaining from Ms Leo acting that is overwrought, phony and foolish. I simply cannot believe that this actress made these "choices" completely on her own. That she plays two roles in the film only adds to the discomfort-level viewers are likely to feel. Mr. Strathairn, from whom I also have never seen anything less than sterling work, is a bit luckier. Halfway (or so) through the film he gets to switch into an ironic, "Let's look at the camera and sort of 'address' the viewer" mode, which he does very well, and this goes quite a distance toward redeeming his work.

Finally, it is Ms. Quinn's idea of conflating a murder mystery with a ghost story with a romance with a time-travel tale -- without the skills to tackle even a single one of these properly -- that leaves everything and everyone in the lurch. This was Quinn's first attempt as writer/director/producer. The good news is that she can only move up from here. Watching the "making of" sections on the DVD's Special Features was interesting, if a little sad: Hearing all these performers go on and on in such sincere fashion about the filmmaking and acting process. Actors, bless, 'em, must give their all and get into the swing of things by feeling, or maybe pretending, that their particular role is something wonderful and worthy of their special skills. The cast does so in spades in this "making-of" featurette. Included, among many other talented folk are Giancarlo Esposito,Denny Dillon and Jason Downs (shown above), all of whom play dual-roles to half-effect. (The photographs above are by Dion Ogust.)

nico said...
ouch! thanks for taking the time to watch.

nicole quinn
James van Maanen, said...
You're welcome, Nicole. And I mean it when I say that I look forward to watching your NEXT film. In fact, if you give me a heads-up, I'll even blog about it. I don't enjoy giving a bad review (which is why, mostly, I keep to the films I like). Over the years, one of the pleasure I've found in seeing a lot of movies is discovering a film I like from a director whose work I had not previously enjoyed. (You can't help wondering: is s/he getting better -- or am I?) Anyway. I'm impressed that you managed to gather up such as great cast for "Racing Daylight."
nico said...
thanks, but i think i'll stick to bloggers and reviewers who actually like my films. you say you don't like writing bad reviews.... no one's forcing you.
James van Maanen, said...
I can understand your reaction, Nicole. And I had should have mentioned in my earlier comment how very gracious was your original short response -- considering how bad my review was. You're right: No one is forcing anybody to write a bad (or a good) review. Maybe the impetus is the same for all of us: We want to communicate. Anyway, I will still watch your next film, if and when it arrives, which I'll hope to enjoy.
nico said...
my mother always said "if you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything at all." and in movie review world that would be a lovely axiom. it is so difficult to get a movie made and then to get it distributed is even harder. the paid critics have been kinder. i wonder ... if what you want to do is communicate why you choose the negative? celebrate what you do like!

my next film SLAP AND TICKLE is set to shoot in june/july starring gloria rueben, linda powell, adam lefevre, melissa leo, and giancarlo esposito. vanguard will again distribute. i hope you do like it. but if you don't ... please think about the time and expense of all those who bled for the film before you blithely shoot missiles at it in an effort to communicate.
James van Maanen, said...
It would be interesting if all reviewers only tackled the films they liked, leaving all other movies un-reviewed (rather than saying anything negative). But then many moviemakers would be up in arms that their film wasn't reviewed -- or reviewed often enough -- and thus didn't find its audience.

One of my relatives also told me the "If you don't have anything nice to say..." chestnut, (I think it was Dorothy Parker who amended that to "If you don't have anything nice to say, come over here and sit next to me"), which can work well in certain situations. But how would adhering to that have helped us get rid of this past Bush administration? That's politics, not art, you say? Well, it's all important.

Still, any critic who has maintained a few shreds of humanity realizes that, yes, a whole lot of work went into the project by a whole lot of people, all of whom were probably doing the best they could. Which I think ought to make it more difficult for us to be really nasty in a review. But sometimes we slip. However, I don't know that all of us are "blithely shooting missiles." We try for some balance, even when were being negative.

In any case, thanks for the heads-up on SLAP AND TICKLE (love that title!), which I will look forward to seeing. Of course, I'll probably have to recuse myself from a review because now, I feel some personal connection to you and your work that I didn't have a few days ago. Thus it will be much more difficult for me to write a bad review. Which is why, I suppose, critics don't always have this kind of communication. But what the hell, it's interesting and I am learning something -- which at my age is always encouraging.

Career Character: In Praise of Melissa Leo

By Sheila O’Malley

Melissa Leo in "Racing Daylight"
I have often been known to say, “I could sooner play a black man then a grown-up lady.” You know, just like one of those ladies in an office, somebody’s wife or something. That feels like the most distant character in many ways. And why bother? There are plenty of girls who, that’s what they do.
– Melissa Leo, Interview with the AV Club, 2008
Life has etched a distinctive beauty upon Melissa Leo’s face. She doesn’t look like anybody else; she is a character actor of the old school, and proud of it. Perhaps, as the quote above reveals, the only part that would not interest her is a “lady in an office” or “somebody’s wife”. Leo brings something very unique to the table, a fearlessly weatherbeaten aspect that can look beautiful, in a faded but resilient way, like an old photograph from another time. Or it can be grittily unattractive, as befitting characters whose lives, often on the edge of ruin, have no place for vanity.

"21 Grams"
Leo did not have the pampering enjoyed by young “breakout” stars, the pretty young women who are pushed to the forefront in prestigious projects, who look adorable and desirable on red carpets. Leo’s ship is starting to come in, with two Oscar nominations under her belt (one for her performance in 2008’s Frozen River and the second for the Mass-accented juggernaut that is her portrayal of Alice Ward in this year’s The Fighter, for which she already scooped up a Best Supporting Actress Golden Globe). But she has been doing excellent work for decades.
Leo has been very lucky as an actress: for over 26 years she has constantly worked on the stage, in feature films, shorts, student films and television. But luck can only play a small part in such a long and diverse career. There is a fierce act of will behind Leo’s kind of success. I get the sense that Leo would be equally happy doing regional theatre productions, spending the spring season as Nora Helmer in A Doll’s House followed by a comedic summer as Sybil in Private Lives, and on and on. She sometimes gives rather prickly answers to questions about her dedication (“are you always in character on-set?”), but it comes from a place where the work is and always has been paramount. Why else do it?

"Homicide: Life on the Street"
Her battles with NBC over her role as Kay Howard, the tough-as-nails homicide detective on Homicide are by now well-known. She wanted Kay to wear trousers, not the tight sweater-and-skirt ensembles so typical of female characters on such shows. She also asked that the script not “track” Kay’s personal or romantic life. A woman operating in an all-male environment has to do what she must to be perceived as “one of the guys”, a character emphasis upon which Leo strongly insisted. She was eventually let go from Homicide; Leo openly admits it was a missed opportunity on the network’s part to explore the realities of a woman in Kay’s situation. But no matter: Leo moved on.
She is known for lending support to short films and student films: if the script is good and someone asks her to be involved, she is likely to say yes. That was how Frozen River came about. Writer-director Courtney Hunt had written a short script about a woman smuggling illegal immigrants across the frozen St. Lawrence River in upstate New York, and had contacted Leo to play the lead. Leo was very impressed with the amount of research Hunt had done, and she clearly recognized that here was a good story that had not yet been told. The short was made, after a couple of years the financing came through to make the feature. It was a short, brutal shoot, with almost no amenities for the cast and crew. Leo’s agent hadn’t wanted her to take the job because they couldn’t give her a trailer.

"Frozen River"
But Leo seems to thrive on the challenge of discomfort, especially if it helps to immerse her in the world of the character. From the first closeup of Leo in Frozen River, huddled in her battered truck, smoking, teeth stained yellow, her face worn with desperation, we know that we are in the presence of something genuine, yet also a throwback to the American films of the 60s and 70s when someone like Donald Sutherland could be considered a leading man, and someone like Ellen Burstyn could be a leading lady. These were unglamorous individuals with unresolved issues and flaws, jagged edges exposed. Stephen Holden wrote in his New York Times review of Frozen River that Leo ”brings the same kind of gravity to the role that Patricia Neal did to Alma Brown in Hud 45 years ago. This weathered, redheaded actress makes you believe in her character’s resilience.”
“Resilience” is a word that comes up often in regard to Leo’s characters. I think of her scrubbing down the grille of her husband’s truck in 21 Grams, weeping because she knows that this time there will be no way out. The truck must be cleaned of all evidence, and her husband (Benicio Del Toro) has disappeared, and she’s the one left to do the dirty work.
Leo gives one of her most remarkable but unremarked performances in Racing Daylight (2007), written and directed by Nicole Quinn. Leo plays a dual role in a story where time bends back to meet itself. First she plays Sadie, a painfully shy woman who takes care of her sick grandmother and who lives primarily in a fantasy world, deeply and secretly in love with the family handyman (played beautifully and humorously by David Strathairn). Leo is first seen carefully plucking a hair out of her chin, peering anxiously at her reflection in the mirror, fear flickering at the edges of her eyes. There’s something in her mind that she can’t quite look at, or admit. She says in voiceover : “I always knew I’d go insane.”

"Racing Daylight"
Leo also plays Anna Stokes, Sadie’s Civil-War-era ancestor, whom the current-day Sadie obsesses over to the degree that she starts to believe she is Anna Stokes, much to the consternation of her gossipy neighbors. Strathairn, looking on as this strange inarticulate woman starts to unravel, turns to the camera at one point and says simply, “This chick is seriously twisted.”
The film is broken into three parts, where different characters come to the forefront in succession; we perceive how they all see one another (everyone plays dual roles), and we also perceive how claustrophobic and incestuous small-town life can be, especially a small town with such a long memory. The boundary between past and present is highly porous, and Sadie slips through. The first part, told from is Sadie’s point of view, is haunting in its portrayal of a woman who lives cocooned in her own unexpressed need, and her own sense that life has passed her by. Her fear of madness is real. Sadie peeks into mirrors cautiously, afraid of what she might find there. She tries to interact with others, but her loneliness and her need for human contact is so acute that it makes her odd, “too much to take”. She does her best to behave like a normal person, and her attempts at flirtation with Strathairn’s character are painful to watch. Sadie’s loneliness vibrates palpably on the surface of her skin, an ache that the whole world can see.
Leo has rarely revealed such vulnerability, such open need, as she does in Racing Daylight. When she touches herself, in unguarded moments, lost in her fantasies of the Civil War drama in the past, she becomes so aroused by the sensation that it leaves her breathless and helpless She lives in the world of other people’s stories. Can she ever star in her own, or is it too late?

"The Fighter"
It seems a far stretch for Leo to go from such a delicate turn in Racing Daylight to her portrayal of Alice Ward inDavid O’ Russell’s The Fighter, where she chomps the scenery, chews it up voraciously, and spits it out in big messy chunks. She smokes like a dragon, stalking around in her carefully-matched outfits and helmet of frosted tips, and her devotion to her family is confrontational and full of rage. Devotion like this is little more than an open threat: “Do not mess with my tribe.” Alice, as is often the case with matriarchs of dysfunctional families, seems to have backed the wrong son, throwing her considerable emotional support behind Dicky, the crack-addicted former boxer (Christian Bale), leaving Micky, the more stable and promising brother, out in the cold. Leo’s performance has been described almost universally as “over-the-top”, but I beg to differ. There are certain pubs in southern Rhode Island and south Boston filled with larger-than-life people like Alice. I recognized that woman immediately. She’s a gun moll without the gangster (and the gun), an even lower-rent Lilly Dillon from The Grifters, ruthless in her goals, and motivated by blood loyalty. Alice is followed around by a terrifying brood of dead-eyed daughters with spritzed bangs, who sit around aimlessly waiting to see what their mother will do, anticipating her battle cry so that they can follow suit. Leo’s performance is an attention-getter, for sure, loud and tough and funny, with big gestures and even bigger hair.
As Patricia Neal and Gena Rowlands had done before her, Leo has the capacity to crack open a character’s inner life like very few actresses working today. She is in this job for the mess, for the unresolved issues of her characters, and this has led her through an unconventional and unglamorous path.  Now that she’s flush with critical acclaim and Hollywood awards, she needs more than ever to keep taking risks and stay on the edge. Her characters have miniscule comfort zones; they are rarely settled, and never complacent. Life is too dangerous, too urgent, and watching Leo’s characters do what it takes to survive, in all its ugliness and brutality, is nothing less than a thrill.
At one point in Racing Daylight, David Strathairn’s character turns to the camera, and says of Leo’s complex and neurotic Sadie,
“She’s tuned into some other channel and ….. it’s very seductive.”
The same could be said for Melissa Leo.

Racing Daylight finds distribution home with Vanguard CinemaBy Ed Grant -- Video Business
VANGUARD CINEMA Street: Dec. 23 Prebook: Nov. 14
Unconventional chick flick toys with time-travel.
A clever variation on Akira Kuro-sawa’s Rashomon, this time-traveling romance presents three points of view on events in present and post-Civil War America. The film is smartly scripted by director Nicole Quinn, but its strongest suit is its cast. Academy Award ® Nominee Melissa Leo (Frozen River, Righteous Kill) plays the schizo lead character, a present-day woman who has hallucinations that she is her 1860s ancestor. The superb David Strathairn (Good Night and Good Luck) steals the picture as the man she loves in both eras, who solves her dilemma when he turns into a third-act narrator who explains most—but not all—of what we have seen.
Shelf Talk: Racing Daylight is hard to categorize, but it is most like memory and time-travel chick flicks The Lake House and The Notebook. Target female viewers looking for a slightly offbeat “timeless romance” with a comfortably happy conclusion.



Monday, April 2, 2012

Netflix Member Reviews



Netflix Member Reviews of Racing Daylight -  (click for Showtime Schedule)
THE GOOD, THE BAD, THE UGLY
I figured that this would be a healthy way to purge any residual sting I get from some of these.


These are the Netflix choices I'm given for a response to the reviews:

You found this review:
HELPFUL
NOT HELPFUL
INAPPROPRIATE

 These are the options I propose:

 DID SOMEONE HOLD A GUN TO YOUR HEAD?
 YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY FINISH A MOVIE BEFORE FEELING COMPELLED TO REVIEW IT
 and
 MAY I KISS YOUR FEET

51 members of the over 25k who have pressed play reviewed Racing Daylight.    I'm not a big art critic.  I mean I think it's pretty subjective.  I know what I like, so with Racing Daylight, I set out to craft a story with little money and great artists, that I could still watch fifteen years down the pike, and be delighted by it.  When I write a story, I don't ever set out to please everyone.  Who can wear such a suit of clothes well?  I try very hard to please myself.

Since this new electronic platform enables it, why not share what others have said about the film, THE GOOD, THE BAD, THE UGLY?  Unedited and without further rebuttal.

 Reviews voted most helpful:


 (*I know this first one is by Nina Shengold, who reviews books for CHRONOGRAM it's the writing style.  Thanks, Nina)

  This truly original low-budget gem is an intriguing, romantic puzzle box of a film that will stay in your heart and mind long after watching. I saw it at a festival screening, but the DVD format is ideal for the intimacy of Quinn's storytelling and the nuanced performances by the always-excellent Melissa Leo and David Strathairn, and a strong supporting cast. All the actors play twin roles in two different eras (contemporary and Civil War), which are linked by the complex layers of vertical history in a small rural town, and perhaps something far more mysterious. If you enjoy brainy, multi-level period romances like "Shakespeare in Love" and "Possession" (especially if you liked A.S. Byatt's book more than the movie!), give "Racing Daylight" a try. 54 out of 54 members found this review helpful

 ********************************************************************

 Wow. Not a masterpiece but its going stay with me. If you like period drama and twisty-turny-time-travely mystery, watch this one! Great cast, great acting, VERY interesting story. 34 out of 34 members found this review helpful ******************************************************************** I really like both David Strathairn and Melissa Leo and had read an on-line article about this low budget film. I was not disappointed. It's one of the most original films I've seen in a long time and while the story is a little "quirky" at times, both actors are in great form. Sabrina Lloyd, who plays two women from different eras (all the leads play double parts) is a real stand out as is Laclanche Durand. If you're looking for something out of the ordinary and a real triumph in indy filmmaking, check this film out. 34 out of 34 members found this review helpful ******************************************************************************


Recent Reviews


If you love poetry (as I do)... you will love this movie, because... this movie, is, pure poetry.
******************************************************************************
To call this film "low budget" is a bit of an understatement. The camera work is very simplified, there are no effects, the score sounds a bit like someone's musicology senior project in college. So if you're looking for something slick and heavily produced, skip this one. I also wouldn't recommend this film for watching while you're working on something else that demands a lot of attention; the plot is non-linear and convoluted with a lot of misleads, and major plot points often happen with no dialogue at all. Throughout the film, the primary characters lead very insular separate lives and never really discuss their experiences with each other. Much of what we learn of their experiences come through a series of voice over soliloquies and brief asides. That said, the acting in this film is superb, the conclusion pleasantly unpredictable, and the story provides a series of fascinating character portraits as each struggles with love and sanity and what it means to be haunted by regret. I think it's fair to say that this film is far from being everyone's cup of tea but still far better than it has any right to be.



 This is an impressive representation of an American-continent literary genre, that started in Argentina in the 1970's, and has evolved as the decades have passed, and it has moved north, first throughout South and Central America, then, in a most terrifying turn in Canada, and finally, as a warm, homey version in the U.S. in the last fifteen years. What began as a heart & spirit-broken "American political magical reality" has become both frightening and psychological, and, in the 2010's a combination of historical and spiritual "magical reality," that explains our medical, spiritual and relational emergence into a quickly-changing political and social era. What will these wonders explain to subsequent generations of our curiosity about each other? This is a most fascinating, lovely, strange movie. Again, it's one of the best of its genre. Do not miss the future of story-telling, even as it is presently four decades old.

********************************************************************************* Another one I could only make it half-way through. The main character was just weird. Which sucks because I think this could have been a good movie. 

***************************************************************************** Obviously, people have dramatically different responses to this movie. Personally, I tend not to like heavily narrated movies. If the drama doesn't stand without someone narrating the story, then something's missing for me. The other thing that bothered me is that what the person narrating called insanity, seemed to be spirit possession and not insanity. There is a difference and mixing the two seemed incongruous and confusing. I thought the story to be confusing, told from two different realities, the same characters playing parts in both realities. I like spiritual -- metaphysical themes, but this film did not hold my interest. I didn't really like the characters or think them very interesting and the story being told seemed very dull. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful ******************************************************************

 Don't expect too much from this movie. Watch it, write down what you liked and didn't like, then take some friends and cameras out into the woods and try to make a better movie. This means you. (you know who you are) 1 out of 1 members found this review helpful ***********************************************************************

 A beautiful, quirky, creative and thoughtful movie. Excellent all the way around! 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful *************************************************************************

 I waffled between giving this film 3 and 4 stars. I settled on three because the film's beginning has an exceptionally shaky and slow start. Having said that, I think the beginning would benefit from a second viewing, which I will give it. In the end, I enjoyed it, particularly the middle portion of its triple pov format. It's certainly worth watching if the premise intrigues you at all. 1 out of 1 members found this review helpful *********************************************************************************

What a surprising film. Starts out slow and then takes many sudden turns and twists. Greatly enjoyed it and found myself laughing outloud many times. Fresh and refreshing. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful 

*********************************************************************************

Nicole Quinn has written a hauntingly beautiful love story that transcends time and space. Racing Daylight has an unusual opening with frenzied music playing over the quiet photographs of homes and places in Cedarsville going back four or five generations. Cedarsville is a quiet observer gently protecting the resident's history and their secrets. Sadie Stokes returns to Cedarsville to take care of her aging gramma; they are the last two surviving Stokes in Cedarsville. The refrain is: There have always been Stokes in Cedarsville. Very early we learn that Sadie has always believed she would go insane. She has been experiencing hallucinations, but she tells no one preferring to just let it happen. Sadie discovers that it is freeing to not fight insanity. Sadie is shy and lonely and would like to reach out to a childhood friend, Henry, who always seems to be around when she needs him. One day Henry tells her of a very old letter he found tucked into the wall of a shed on her property. When she reads it Sadie discovers it was written to Anna a Stokes ancestor. Things begin to change for Sadie upon reading the letter. Her hallucinations are becoming interactive which makes you wonder are they hallucinations or is she being possessed and pulled out of time by the spirit of Anna? Except for the chaotic music in the opening you'll find the music is beautiful floats along with the babbling brook, buzzing insects and summer songbirds you can almost feel cool afternoon breezes as you walk along with Sadie in her travels. The characters are wonderful and funny, especially Henry, and they help to tell Sadie's story. Just when you think you have Sadie's story figured out... There are many twists and turns in this 300 year old ghost story. I will be adding this to my personal collection. Have fun! ToniHunterOne 10-28-11 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful 

********************************************************************************

Four stars for originality. I see that some viewers did not like the format, and while I suppose this story could have been told on a much more grandiose scale, it was still good entertainment. The story looks at the the concept of reincarnation and that it may be the people in our lives now are people with whom we have unfinished business from past lives. I like that the movie didn't veer to an occult type feeling despite the subject. It's not a ghost story in any sense, but does allow an interesting explanation for seemingly "paranormal" type experiences. I wish there were more movies like this. 10 out of 10 members found this review helpful 

*********************************************************************************

 sorry, but this seems kind of ridiculous from the beginning. I didnt make it through the first half. 5 out of 9 members found this review helpful 

*********************************************************************************

wOW, THIS WAS THE STUPIDEST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN! Totally wasted and hour and a half! 8 out of 10 members found this review helpful 

******************************************************************************** I was expecting Somewhere in Time on a low budget; if you read all the glowing reviews that came before me. What I got was a low budget that was so far different, that it must have come from drunken mind of the on-set janitors, they wrapped Somewhere in Time.. He had to wait til he had completly pickled his brain and was close to 80 or so then he regurgitated this story. 4 out of 6 members found this review helpful 

***************************************************************************** A
refreshing change from the norm. The characters are flawed with foibels that make them intresting and intriguing. This movie is for the open minded person that thinks outside the box. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 ********************

I truely enjoyed this movie. Nicely paced and entertaining. So very original. It wasnt what I expected, and Im so glad. I recommend you give it a try. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful 

*************************

 I totally loved this quiet little movie. Its unpretentious manner and twisting plot just delighted me. There was sadness, because of the condition of the people and their personal struggles, but there was humor for the very same reasons. This was a fun and crazy treat - a great little story and told in a great way! 6 out of 6 members found this review helpful

 ********************************

 This is probably one of the strangest movies Ive ever seen -- but I like it that way. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 ************************************

 Somewhat original story concerning a woman named Sadie (played by Melissa Leo) who is caretaker for her infirm grandmother. Sadie begins having visions of a young man seemingly calling to her and calling her Anna. The story itself is told in three parts for three separate characters and there are many flashbacks to the Civil War era. Anna (also played by Leo) was in love with two men, one presumed dead and is, in turn, haunted by and haunts both men involved in a love triangle. The story was a little confusing at times, mainly because of the third part of the story where Strathairns character narrates the story directly to the camera. I think this should have been done from the beginning of the story and not focusing so much on Sadie/Annas narration. I did enjoy this as the acting was outstanding, especially by Leo. I cannot rate it higher because of the confusing out of place narration in the last part of the story. Good for a watch, especially on Instant. 6 out of 6 members found this review helpful 

***********************************************

 This film could have worked but it missed due to the casting on a very important issue, age. Either they should have found a much younger actress to play Sadie or a much older man to play Edmund. The acting was par on and the whole film was quirky from beginning to end. I also feel that the writing suffered from being too choppy. There was no flow and could have worked much better if Henry could have narrated from beginning to end. I felt that the movie had good actors but lacked good writing and good decisions by those in charge of the direction, to make the whole film work. Pieces like these can work with little money, this one just didnt. The good thing that comes from this though is learning about good actors that I will look forward to watching in future. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 *******************************************************

 I didnt give this one star because it seemed mean-spirited. But this movie is weird, just plain weird. I dont mind weird, but confusing and senseless too, I do. This movie seemed to have a personality disorder. It wasnt sure whether it was a mystery, a ghost story or a romance. Then it tried to be a documentary at the end. I dont mind low budget films if the story is good. But this just didnt live up to its potential. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful

*******************************************************

 The first 3/4 of this movie is excellent. It is not big budget, but who cares! It is going along wonderfully and then it does a complete 360 and ruins everything. It stars out quirky, then it gets funny, and it has some small elements of suspense, a mixing of the past and the present, intermingling together. It is excellent! And then comes the last quarter of the film. When you see HENRY on the screen denoting the next section of the film, prepare yourself for that 360. It ruined it for me, I very sorry to say. I do recommend watching this low key movie, but I cant say it will leave you satisfied. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 ***************************************

 Melissa Leo is luminous as a woman whose hold on sanity may or may not be in question, and David Strathairn gives an excellent, nuanced performance, with a tinge of humor I have not seen in him.The movie has three parts, but manges this without being disjointed. Watch for a slam bang ending and enjoy every moment. There are not enough movies of this caliber around.Movie Mama 7 out of 7 members found this review helpful

 ***********************************

 Loved the quirky twists and touches of humor in this little movie. I also loved the old fashioned ambience and the fact that the lead characters are grownups. Imagine, a romance featuring attractive characters older than twenty! This ghost story was not made for adolescent sleepovers but is great fun for grownups. I am now looking for other David Strathairn films to watch. 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

 ******************************************

 A fine idea that just did not fulfill the grand idea.. Plot had a lot of possibilities that never were developed.. Maybe David Strathaim,and Melissa Leo were a trifle long in the tooth for their roles !!! But still filled them quite well.. My Wife raved about the film,and maybe because it is a Woman,s movie.. Maybe I should look at it through a woman,s eyes... A film that you will love or hate.. The reviews shows the wide spread of opinions,and this is mine !!! 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful

*********************************

 I found this to be a strange movie, but as it progressed it made me begin to think, of things not thought of........ I now feel its a movie to be watched many times over, with different things to be found each time. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

***************************************

 I liked it. Very interesting not what I expected. If you are into the strange and unusual this is one to watch. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 ****************************************************

 What a great idea for a movie, that somehow went horribly wrong. More than once I felt so embarassed for Sadie. The characters were likable, but the plot was just so slow and I have to say, the ages of Sadie and Henry/Harry just kind of took the excitement out of the story for me. I didnt care for the quirk soundtrack either. 5 out of 5 members found this review helpful

 ****************************************

 Not your typical movie, this film is a slow-burn of a story that reveals itself gently, the layers peeling away then doubling back, hinting at how the two interweaving timelines twist together. Is it a ghost story, or something else? What happened all those years ago? Are the charactors reincarnated, or ancestors? Is the heroine really losing her mind? I enjoyed it immensely because of all the questions, and the fact that not all of them were answered fully. Keep an open mind, be patient with the story, and it will steal you away and into a tilted world where everyone has ghosts. David Straithairn is solid as usual, and Jason Downs interpretation of Edmond/Billy was charming and unaffected. 10 out of 10 members found this review helpful

 **********************************************

 Dont waste your time on this movie when there are so many other good ones out there. I absolutely disagree with the reviewer who compared it to Shakespeare in Love. They are on completely different levels. That review got me interested in the movie in the first place and I now wish I would have read on down to get the opinion of the more intelligent movie viewing audience. A real stinker. Oh, and I have to agree that trying to make the actors look young was almost embarrassing. 7 out of 8 members found this review helpful

 ****************************************

 This film was CLEARLY done with a small budget but still remains interesting and entertaining. I will warn viewers though - this movie is weird,weird,WEIRD.... you have to have an open mind to appreciate it. Its a little slow and oddly paced in the beginning but the more you listen to the story, the more curious you become on how it will turn out, and then before you know it you are invested in a pretty intriguing mystery. This movie isnt necessarily cinema gold, but I would recommend at least giving it a chance. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful 

********************************************

 Wonderful actors trapped in a poorly conceived, disastrously directed after school special. I cringed when the marvelous Melissa Leo and David Straitharn played young. Ick. 7 out of 7 members found this review helpful

 *********************************************************

 I really hate writing or posting a 1 Star review, but I guess credit, or the lack thereof, must be given where it is due. The lighting, sound and cinematography are more like an amateur home movie than a professional motion picture. Its obviously a low budget flick, but why any movie producer would skimp on the three things that make a film appeal to an audiences sense of sight and sound is beyond me. Also, the female lead, bless her heart, is really not attractive enough for the viewer to imagine as the lead in a romance movie. Sorry if this sounds cruel, but the lead romantic actress in this film should have been at least 20 years younger with some feminine curves that are at the least detectable to the naked eye. The actor who plays the civil war soldier in the mirror has a lot of potential, but his role suffers from lack of experienced direction and a poor script. The script and dialogue are not engaging and caused me quite a few yawns while trying to get all the way through this mess. Whoever did the casting did so without any clear concept of how certain groups of actors complement each other while other groups of actors are just square pegs in round holes. The woman playing the grandmother is also not a very convincing actress and I found myself wishing that her character would just please go ahead and succumb to her illness because she was such a burden to watch. My overall rating for this one is 1 Star and 4 Hooves down in a stall that hasnt been mucked out for two weeks... 10 out of 10 members found this review helpful

 ************************************************

 I loved Possession and Shakespeare in Love, so I rented this movie because a reviewer suggested that the renter would like this one as well. BIG MISTAKE! Halfway throught the movie, I turned it off and wanted to gouge my eyes out like another reviewer stated, should have listened to that review instead. After trying to watch this movie, I firmly believe that anyone one of us on the face of Earth could have done a better job and cannot believe someone funded this disaster. Hate it when I have high hopes and end up disappointed. Considering there are only 19+ review for this movie should warn you not to waste you time. Got to call my mom and tell her to take this out of her Queue or she may end up disowning me. 7 out of 7 members found this review helpful 

*******************************************

 Not the same old thing!!, enjoyable naration and unusual story line. Good one to watch if your fighting insomnia. Not that it puts you to sleep , but it puts sort of a gental or maby a placid mood on you. thanks and good night La 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

*************************************************

 Hopefully, like me, you will not have the urge to gouge out your own eyes rather than watch this movie. I admit I only made it 3/4 of the way through this huge super burrito of a mess but I didnt want to scare the neighbors when I ran out of the house screaming. Seriously, its bad. Back to browsing!!!! 6 out of 7 members found this review helpful ****************************************** I thoroughly enjoyed this bizarre little story. It took awhile to get started, but it grew on me. Melissa Leo was great in her part, but David Strathairn was perfect. He had me chuckling during the last part of the film. The story is intelligent and uniquely delivered in this film. 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

 ********************************

 An interesting idea, but stunning in its awful execution. The whole thing was just a confusing mess. The lead character's recurring shy muteness made me think I'd missed something early on and that Grandma, despite her dementia, might be more capable caring for her feebleminded granddaughter. 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

 ************************************

 I would love to see this movie but it was broke when it arrived. I would like to see it. Please send me the movie (Racing Daylight).

 ***************************************

 This was a strange and slow movie, but David Strathairn played his charactor with humor. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful


*******************************************************************

 I'm always looking for that rare jewel. This movie glitters with genealogy, acting ability, and one heck of storyline. Watch this movie when you have nothing but time to listen, watch, and absorb. Then be prepared to laugh & appreciate good work. 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful *****************************************************

 "Racing Daylight" is one of the most intriguing films I've seen in a long time! Directing from her script, Nicole Quinn kept me on the edge of my seat trying to keep up with a very intelligent story. The cinematography was exquisite (less so the music) and the acting flawless. You may want to watch RD twice, once for the mystery, then again to see how it was done. Enjoy! 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

 *************************************************

 This movie was AWFUL! I could have done a better job making this movie with my cell phone video recorder in hand, filming in my backyard!!! Don't waste your time. I wish I had not. 3 out of 3 members found this review helpful

 *********************************************

 Wow. I will put up with a lot in the name of a romantic movie, but holy cow, that was bad. Disjointed, toe-curlingly embarrassing, unlikable heroine, just plain terrible. 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful

 ****************************************************

 I had watched this movie at dozen times it is great. It has what a movies should has, murder, romance, funny.It Is original, the movie the we see now at the movie theater are copy. I love the beauty, of the
actors . I wish to see this movie in the theater,to appreciate the sound ,the pictures are incredible. You have to see it to believe it. 1 out of 1 members found this review helpful 

***********************************

 There's an interesting idea at the core of the film - people from the present day and Civil War times haunting one another - but the amateurish execution makes the whole thing very tedious, and sometimes confusing. The style isn't even consistent among the three sections of the film - the first two use voiceover narration, while the last one - focusing on Strathairn's modern-day character - has him speaking directly to the camera (we find out why at the end - one of the film's more eye-rolling "surprises"). I did rather enjoy Strathairn's humorous line delivery, but Leo's performance is disappointing - her character's mute reactions to Strathairn at first seem very silly even given her shyness. This is perhaps a few steps above a student film. I don't know why Strathairn, Leo and Giancarlo Esposito (who is wasted) did this. 4 out of 4 members found this review helpful 

****************************************************

 Embarrassing and unwatchable. Considering the wonderful cast (Strathairn & Leo) it's a stunningly awful movie. I felt very sorry for the actors. 6 out of 6 members found this review helpful 

***************************************

 While waiting to see Melissa Leo in the soon-to-be-available (and critically heralded) Frozen River, I was hoping for a glimpse of good work from this very busy actress to tide me over. This was not her best work. She has been in a lot of films and tv over the years, but I just couldn't recall her. She does have an earnest quality about her, which is endearing, but the story in this film left something to be desired. The usually dependable Strathairn was also wasted here. Had a straight to video Hallmark-channel period piece quality to it. Watchable, but just not very good. D+ 2 out of 2 members found this review helpful

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Jason Downs at Shadowland

Jason Downs has something great going on! The last of a three night run of his new play/revue WHY AM I NOT FAMOUS is happening tonight at the gem of a jewel-box theatre SHADOWLAND in Ellenville . It's a delightful evening, with GREAT musical numbers and charming performers asking very brave questions about fame. It's a coming-of-age, memoir, musical review. When the evening ends, we're asking ourselves the same question - why isn't Jason famous, and damn, he ought to be. Racing Daylight company alums Melissa Leo, David Smilow (confederate soldier who kills Harry), Sophia Raab Downs (producer), Paul Quinn (exec prod) and I were in the capacity audience for last night's standing ovation. Sophia took the stage to sing an encore number with her husband, a perfect button to an exciting new show. Between you and me, I think you'll get more opportunities to see this one in NYC! If you have the chance, see it tonight.